Publication information can also be found on my Google Scholar profile. Journals are the primary publication venues for cognitive science and neuroscience, and conferences are the primary venues for human-computer interaction research.

RIDS: Implicit detection of a selection gesture using hand motion dynamics during freehand pointing in virtual reality

  • Zhang, T., Hu, Z., Gupta, A., Wu, C.-H., Benko, H., & Jonker, T. R. (2022). In Proceedings of ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST). (link)

Optimizing the timing of intelligent suggestion in virtual reality

  • Yu, D., Desai, R., Zhang, T., Benko, H., Jonker, T. R. & Gupta, A. (2022). In Proceedings of ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST). (link)

Detecting input recognition errors and user errors using gaze dynamics in virtual reality

  • Sendhilnathan, N., Zhang, T., Lafreniere, B., Grossman, T., & Jonker, T. R. (2022). In Proceedings of ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST). (link)

Gaze as an indicator of input recognition errors

  • Peacock, C. E., Lafreniere, B., Zhang, T., Santosa, S., Benko, H., & Jonker, T. R. (2022). In Proceedings of ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications (ETRA). (link)

Computational adaptation of XR interfaces through interaction stimulation

  • Todi, K., Lafreniere, B., & Jonker, T. R. (2022). In CHI ‘22 workshop “Computational Approaches for Understanding, Generating, and Adapting User Interfaces”. (pdf)

Investigating cross-modal approaches for evaluating error acceptibility of a recognition-based input technique

  • Henderson, J., Jonker, T. R., Lank, E., Wigdor, D., & Lafreniere, B. (2022). In Proceedings of ACM Symposium on Interactive, Mobile, and Ubiquitous Technologies. (link)

Gaze dynamics are sensitive to target orienting for working memory encoding in virtual reality

  • Peacock, C. E., Zhang, T., Murdison, T. S., Boring, M. J., Benko, H., & Jonker, T. R. (2022). Journal of Vision, 22, 2. (link)

False positives vs. false negatives: The effects of recovery time and cognitive costs on input error preference

  • Lafreniere, B., Jonker, T. R., Santosa, S., Parent, M., Glueck, M., Grossman, T., Benko, H., & Wigdor, D. (2021). In Proceedings of ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST). (link)

Towards gaze-based prediction of the intent to interact in virtual reality

  • David-John, B., Peacock, C. E., Zhang, T., Mudison, T. S., Benko, H., & Jonker, T. R. (2021). In Proceedings of ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications (ETRA). (pdf)

Predicting visual attention using the hidden structure in eye-gaze dynamics

  • Lengyal, G., Carlberg, K., Samad, M., & Jonker, T. R. (2021). In CHI ‘21 workshop “Eye Movements as an Interface to Cognitive State”. (pdf)

Gaze signatures decode the onset of working memory encoding

  • Peacock, C. E., David-John, B., Zhang, T., Murdison, T. S., Boring, M. J., Benko, H., & Jonker, T. R. (2021). In CHI ‘21 workshop “Eye Movements as an Interface to Cognitive State”. (pdf, video)

Continuous decoding of cognitive load from electroencephalography reveals task-general and task-specific correlates

  • Boring, M. J., Ridgeway, K., Shvartsman, M., & Jonker, T. R. (2020). Journal of Neural Engineering, 17, 056016. (link)

The role of AI in mixed and augmented reality interactions

  • Jonker, T. R., Desai, R., Carlberg, K., Hillis, J., Keller, S., & Benko, H. (2020). In CHI ‘20 workshop “Artificial Intelligence for HCI: A Modern Approach”. (pdf)

Hybrid methodology: Combining ethnography, cognitive science, and machine learning to inform the development of context‐aware personal computing and assistive technology

  • Cury, M., Whitworth, E., Barfort, S., Bochereau, S., Browder, J., Jonker, T. R., Kim, K. S., Krenchel, M., Ramsey-Elliot, M., Schüür, F., Zax, D. & Zhang, J. (2019). Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings. (link)

Drawing improves memory: The importance of multimodal encoding context

  • Wammes, J. D., Jonker, T. R., & Fernandes, M. A. (2019). Cognition, 191, 103955. (link)

Drawing enhances item information but undermines sequence information in memory

  • Jonker, T. R., Wammes, J. D., & MacLeod, C. M. (2019). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45, 689-699. (link)

Neural reactivation in parietal cortex enhances memory for episodically linked information

  • Jonker, T. R., Dimsdale-Zucker, H., Ritchey, M., Clarke, A, & Ranganath, C. (2018). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115, 11084-11089. (pdf)

Two sources of information in reconstructing event sequence

  • Jonker, T. R. & MacLeod, C. M. (2018). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44, 1013-1022. (link)

Not all order memory is equal: Test demands reveal dissociations in memory for sequence information

  • Jonker, T. R., & MacLeod, C. M. (2017). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44, 1013-1022. (pdf)

Individual differences in incorrect responding and the ability to discriminate the source of the products of retrieval

  • Jonker, T. R. (2016). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42, 1078-1089. (pdf).

Retrieval-induced forgetting and context

  • Jonker, T. R., Seli, P., & MacLeod, C. M. (2015). Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 273-278. (pdf)

Can research participants comment authoritatively on the validity of their self-reports of mind wandering and task engagement?

  • Seli, P., Jonker, T. R., Cheyne, J. A., Cortes, K., & Smilek, D. (2015). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41, 703-709.

Disruption of relational processing underlies poor memory for order

  • Jonker, T. R., & MacLeod, C. M. (2015). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 41, 831-840. (pdf)

Testing the item order account of design effects using the production effect

  • Jonker, T. R., Levene, M., & MacLeod, C. M. (2014). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 40, 441-448. (pdf)

Production improves memory equivalently following elaborative vs. non-elaborative processing

  • Forrin, N. D., Jonker, T. R., & MacLeod, C. M. (2014). Memory, 22, 470-480. (pdf)

Performance reactivity in a continuous-performance task: Implications for understanding post-error behavior

  • Jonker, T. R., Seli, P., Cheyne, J. A., & Smilek, D. (2013). Consciousness & Cognition, 22, 1468-1476.

Putting retrieval-induced forgetting in context: An inhibition-free, context-based account

  • Jonker, T. R., Seli, P., & MacLeod, C. M. (2013). Psychological Review, 120, 852-872. (pdf)

Individual differences in remembering

  • MacLeod, C. M., Jonker, T. R., & James, G. (2013). Chapter in T. Perfect and D. S. Lindsay (Eds.), Handbook of applied memory. London: Sage Publications.

A methodological note on evaluating performance in a sustained attention to response task

  • Seli, P., Jonker, T. R., Solman, G. J. F., Cheyne, J. A., & Smilek, D. (2013). Behavior Research Methods, 45, 355-363.

Enhancing SART validity by statistically controlling speed-accuracy trade-offs

  • Seli, P., Jonker, T. R., Cheyne, J. A., & Smilek, D. (2013). Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 265.

Less we forget: Retrieval cues and release from retrieval-induced forgetting

  • Jonker, T. R., Seli, P., & MacLeod, C. M. (2012). Memory & Cognition, 40, 1236-1245. (pdf)

Retrieval-induced forgetting: Testing the competition assumption of inhibition theory

  • Jonker, T. R., & MacLeod, C. M. (2012). Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 204-211. (pdf)